Loudmouth son of Dr. Kwame Nkrumah, Ghana’s first president, Sekou Nkrumah has revealed that the vision his late father had for Ghana was bigger than the country itself.
According to him, the vision was a Pan African one which had two achievable agendas; decolonization of Africa and the unity of the African continent.
He added that anyone who seems to not have a fair idea of Nkrumah’s vision for Ghana and Africa as a whole do not know what the man stood for before he was ousted in a bloody coup d’etat in 1969.
“Nkrumah’s vision was bigger than Ghana. It is the pan African agenda that had two main thrusts: first the decolonization of Africa, secondly the continental unity.
If you don’t understand that vision you will misunderstand all that Nkrumah stood for,” he wrote in a facebook post.
As usual of him, Sekou descended on the late former president Rawlings, describing him as a person who was “empty.”
He accused him also of betraying the revolution when he ran to the World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) for bailout when economic situations in Ghana at the time were alarming.
“You see I am prepared to overlook J.J ‘s early atrocities but he himself lost his way when he made his famous u-turn and ended up as a puppet to the World Bank and IMF, and in a sense betrayed the revolution,” he stated.
Read his full facebook below;
My final words on J.J, and why he should not be compared to Nkrumah!
Nkrumah’s vision was bigger than Ghana. It is the pan African agenda that had two main thrusts: first the decolonization of Africa, secondly the continental unity.
If you don’t understand that vision you will misunderstand all that Nkrumah stood for.
The West and their interests overthrew Nkrumah. Look at the bigger picture and you will better comprehend Nkrumah’s political struggle.
Now it is the same West that forced Rawlings’ hand to turn to democracy (he himself said he does not believe in democracy). JJ had no choice than to play ball, the whole world by the early 1990s was turning in that direction.
True, today Ghana is practicing democracy but are we developed economically? Are our resources not still exploited? Can we industrialized?
You see I am prepared to overlook J.J ‘s early atrocities but he himself lost his way when he made his famous u-turn and ended up as a puppet to the World Bank and IMF, and in a sense betrayed the revolution.
For me, Nkrumah was a much better option, but they (the West) did not allow it!
Nkrumah had intellectual depth and was ideologically strong! J.J on the other hand was empty, just a brute.
To compare the two as individuals is very sad and shocking (go and read Nkrumah’s numerous political books! J.J could not even write one).
It is their support base that makes them stand together (their political constituency was the ordinary Ghanaian).
I stand with them for social justice, but I am not naive to struggle with telling the difference between the two men. It is a huge gap that to pretend not to see it, is the height of intellectual dishonesty or maybe just old plain ignorance.